Nellie Taraba Wallberg vs Kateryna Lazarenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve: Nellie Taraba Wallberg has won 36.83% of points on their second serve in recent months, slightly surpassing Kateryna Lazarenko's 36.56%. This marginal edge could be crucial in determining match outcomes.
• Return Game: When it comes to return games, Wallberg has an advantage, capturing 54.99% of points on her opponent's second serve and 35.87% on first serve returns, compared to Lazarenko's 54.38% and 30.24% respectively.
• Under Pressure: Lazarenko shows resilience under pressure, saving 50.33% of breakpoints, while Wallberg has saved 45.34%. This suggests Lazarenko might have an edge in critical moments.
• Match Wins: Over the past year, Lazarenko boasts a higher win rate, triumphing in 67.27% of her matches, compared to Wallberg's 56.52%. Lazarenko's consistency could play a decisive role.
• Surface Preference: Both players excel on indoor hard courts with a win rate of 56%. However, Lazarenko struggles more on clay, with a win rate of just 33% compared to Wallberg's 54%.
• Competitive Level: Lazarenko has competed at a slightly higher level recently, winning 68.63% of matches at ITF tournaments, versus Wallberg's 64.29% at Challenger events.
• Opponent Quality: Wallberg has faced tougher opponents, with an average ranking of 280.74, while Lazarenko's opponents had an average ranking of 433.64, potentially favoring Wallberg in adapting to quality play.
• Deciding Sets: If the match goes the distance, Wallberg has a slight edge, winning 75% of deciding sets compared to Lazarenko's 70% over the last year.

Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):

Nellie Taraba Wallberg and Kateryna Lazarenko face off in a match that highlights subtle differences in both performance and adaptability.

Wallberg's superior return game might grant her an early advantage, given her higher percentage in winning points on both first and second serve returns. However, Lazarenko's capability to withstand pressure, as evidenced by her higher breakpoint save percentage, cannot be underestimated.

While Lazarenko has shown greater overall match success and brings a competitive edge from participating at more frequent ITF events, Wallberg's experience against higher-ranked opponents and her proficiency in closing deciding sets may balance the scales.

Despite Wallberg’s marginal statistical advantages on paper, Kateryna Lazarenko's stronger overall match performance over the last year suggests she is slightly more likely to win this upcoming match.